Showing posts with label Big Society. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Big Society. Show all posts

Monday, 27 January 2014

Prudhoe faces yet another development crisis?

How many people work full time for Prudhoe? Is the Homes and Communities Agency really the Homes Agency? What is 21st century development?

Work back through my blog and over several years around 2010 there were many blog posts over the Town Centre. Prudhoe should have a new town centre fit for purpose in a mushrooming town. An area was zoned in the 1960s. It remains undeveloped to this day. At great effort its landowner in summer 2012 finally got planning permission only for his prime partner to walk away. The result on a site surrounded by neighbours is long term planning blight. It is a very unfortunate outcome. In my view the project failed because its landlord totally lacked the vision to deliver an excellent proposal respecting all his neighbours and their many concerns as well as the geography of the site. Not everyone can be kept happy all the time but unless most people are kept happy most of the time things do not work. The project that was offered to Prudhoe was simply second rate, 1960s rather than 21st century, "good" should not  be good enough.

That is a preamble to saying "it is all about to happen again". Move a mile and more from the town centre and you reach the valley of the Stanley Burn. An area largely of woodland, defined Green Belt and as it happens wholly inside the Derwent Valley Heritage Landscape and subject to a very large upcoming HLF project. Within it lies Prudhoe Hospital, the link is to an English Heritage and English Partnerships report from 2008 which makes sound reading. That explains the historic context and at 1.1 says:
1.1
Context of the Prudhoe historic characterisation

In 2005 English Heritage (EH) and English Partnerships (EP) began jointly to explore the use of Historic Characterisation (HC) in preliminary regeneration planning. Three experimental pilot projects were carried out to test various methods using former hospital sites - Graylingwell in Chichester, Hanham Hall near Bristol, and the present study, Prudhoe, in the Tyne Valley. EH and EP intend to use the results of the pilots to produce generic guidance for the use of HC on sites of similar scale and levels of complexity. 

EH and EP believe that conducting HC at the pre-masterplanning stage can make a positive contribution to the planning and regeneration process. Such early characterisation is not intended to replace archaeological evaluations or the traditional detailed surveys of architectural fabric that might be needed at later stages to inform detailed design or as mitigation. Instead, HC offers something new for planning and design teams: a forward-looking and contextual understanding of a site’s historic development and present day historically-derived character that can be drawn upon to inform the masterplan for a site.
 
That sounds splendid. It is only since last summer that the outcome by what is now the Homes and Communities Agency has become clearer with the notion that outline planning permission will be sought soon.
This is the result:
There is a new hospital: tick. There is one new development called Humbles Wood, ongoing now. Okay. Alarm bells begin. Two major new developments have happened, Moor Road has received no attention and no access beyond the car and the foot is provided.

And so we reach the last few weeks and the appearance of this diagram. For all this effort from EP and EH what have we got? A project to build not a community, let alone one respecting its context, but a plan to knock as much down as is possible and build 375 homes? Where will these people work? How will they get to where they work? Where are the employment opportunities on site? How are the homeworkers and self employed going to be faciliated?

The point of the Characterisation was to start a debate! It was to lead to something like the Crichton solution. But it appears wholly derailed. Why?

Because as this visualisation appeared, people have started to ask questions. There are two listed properties which the developers HAVE to respect. The Hall and the Walled Garden. They will respect them. The developer knows that. That does not mean Community benefit will follow and in a narrow sense that does not have to be. However there are people in the community who want a crack at the walled garden and I would think it incumbent on the developer to talk closely with them. There is a reasonable chance that this will happen.

But what about the rest of this huge site and this:


or
The top picture shows the 1930s recreation pavilion and figure 17:5 in the EH report shows it in all its new glory. Find that.  The bottom picture is one of the resident blocks which could be adapted in various ways into outstanding housing of character. A character to retain the Garden Village character of the original location and which justified EH's initial interest.

Only a development which creates a community and offers workspace in a special and characterful context will do. That means respecting, some, not all, of what there is.

That is not what the HCA Gentoo proposal currently does. It does the BARE MINIMUM to respect legal obligation. Its primary aim appears to be the short term gain of as much profit as possible and leaving Prudhoe to pick up the pieces. And what are those pieces, 375 new homes, no public transport and a massive traffic jam at Blaydon Roundabout or Ovingham Bridge. There is no contextual planning. There is no notion that a B road from Horsley over the Tyne and through this environment to Ebchester would be a good idea. There is just nothing apart from we want to demolish everything we can and build 375 homes and walk away. That is not community building!!! Gentoo - the Sunderland social housing organisation say of themselves "Our vision is to improve the Art of Living beyond imagination".

I am saying this now because Prudhoe has a Community Arts Project looking for a home. I approached HCA asking that we might be allowed to look inside the Recreation Pavilion. I was sent away with a flea in my ear (by email) and told the building will be demolished. It has no protection and because even EH could not find its original architect's name unlikely to get any. It should have a considerate owner. It does not. It is Prudhoe's De La Warr pavilion. No kidding, it is what it can be.

It all sounds as if  the "Prudhoe is there to be done unto by its landlords" complex is alive and well again. Urgent action by the Town Council, our two County Councillors, the Community Partnership (which is certainly alive to all this) and our MP is needed.  There is a difference this time around, we have another MP and he is well briefed on the issues:


Saturday 25th January 2014.

Tuesday, 19 November 2013

Wikimedia at the Mining Insitute

This post was first published here (and has photos there) http://blog.wikimedia.org.uk/2013/11/1995/

Mining information at the Mining Institute

 

This post was written by Robert Forsythe, former Wikimedian in Residence at Tyne & Wear Archives & Museums

For fans of the Victorian Gothic and Dr Who’s Tardis, a visit to Newcastle upon Tyne’s North of England Institute of Mining and Mechanical Engineers (also known as “The Mining Institute”) is a must. The building is an outstanding creation in the Victorian Gothic style and, as with the Tardis, it is much more spacious than the outside might suggest.

Robert Forsythe began talking to the Mining Institute about a relationship with Wikimedians in the summer, a relationship cemented by a visit from Harry Mitchell – which itself was a direct result of the first Newcastle meetup in September. The outcome was a very successful editathon at the North of England Institute of Mining and Mechanical Engineers on 6th November. Harry Mitchell led the event and 12 people attended from the North East of England. Four Wikimedians (Peter Gans, Dan Garry, Chris McKenna, and Harry Mitchell) travelled to Newcastle to assist. One newcomer to Wikimedia travelled all the way from Plymouth and was so impressed by the day she requested an editathon for her institution. At least five new accounts were created on the day (several people had already created accounts in anticipation of the event) and the new editors, helped by the experienced Wikimedians, made edits to multiple articles relating to the Mining Institutes’s collection and uploaded a couple of images to Wikimedia Commons.

The exercise was designed to develop relations between the staff and volunteers of the institute and Wikimedians. It was a great success in this, partly because some of the Wikimedians who travelled in came the night before and attended a lecture by Bill Lancaster in the Mining Institutes’s lecture theatre. The lecture revealed that key contributors from the North East have not been well served by classic academia despite a wealth of information existing about them. Bill Lancaster expressed the hope that Wikimedia could be a tool to pay people like Christopher Blackett and Edmund Mills Hann their due.

A number of the institutes’s trustees and management team spoke directly about the opportunity they saw over the two days the Wikimedians were in town. As part of the learning curve, Jennifer Hillyard, the institutes’s librarian took everyone on a tour of the institute. This included seeing a very early painting of the coal industry whose uploading to Wikimedia Commons she suggested. The Institute has always had an excellent library. However in recent years some very significant collections threatened by the implosion of Britain’s coal mining industry have arrived. All of us were somewhat stunned by 16 roller racked rows of material which had arrived. One whole row contained 16,700 pamphlets from the Coal Research Establishment in Stoke Orchard (near Cheltenham). Another massive rack is full of German mining resources. The institute is therefore in pole position in terms of providing an authoritative view into the mining world of Britain and further afield. And it wishes to see Wikimedia Commons, Wikisource, Wikipedia contributions as routes whereby its increasingly very rare holdings are made available to the world wide audience.

Discussions are ongoing about the possibility of a follow-up event and about other projects which can be undertaken with the Mining Institute so watch this space.

Robert Forsythe was previously the first Wikimedian in Residence in the North East of England, serving with the Tyne & Wear Archives & Museums service. Since the summer he has been assisting the Mining Institute develop its Wikimedia relationship. Along with  Harry Mitchell, Robert ran the event.

 

Tuesday, 1 October 2013

Wikimedia at the Mining Institute

Harry Mitchell's Wiki Commons image of the exterior.
Earlier in 2013 Wikimedia (parent to Wikipedia) was engaged in North East England through Tyne and Wear Archives and Museums. This was with the first Wikimedian in Residence in the region. I was the fortunate candidate and very fascinating it proved to be. An interesting follow on has been arranged for the 6th November 2013. An editathon is being held in the North of England Institute of Mining and Mechanical Engineers just a very short walk east of Newcastle Upon Tyne Central station. I will be participating and it ought to appeal to a wide spread of people. It is a magnificent venue, a major piece of Victorian gothic revival. Lunch and a guided tour are part of the package provided. There is already Wikimedia content but once you see the collections, you will understand just how much connectivity between the Institute and Wikimedia there might be. If you feel you are a Wikimedia beginner, there will be experienced editors on hand. And if "mining" phases you reflect how much local and regional social history runs with the subject. Additionally the library hosts the collections of local Stephenson Locomotive Society and Railway Correspondence & Travel Society branches. It has become a place where many volunteers interested in industrial heritage in the region gather (not least because it has a license and offers excellent coffee). More details from https://wiki.wikimedia.org.uk/wiki/Editathon,_North_of_England_Institute_of_Mining_and_Mechanical_Engineers .

14 sign ons at 4th October.

Sunday, 8 September 2013

Carrick City of Adelaide leaves Irvine 9th September 2013





Carrick ARRIVED in Irvine 30th May 1993



Back in about 1988 when I was curator at the Scottish Maritime Museum, I took part with Campbell McMurray in the first steps that moved the Carrick/City of Adelaide. In the event in 1989 both of us moved on from the SMM but not before (and receiving from both of us a lot of time) the Linthouse Building was on the move. The latter despite one or two ups and downs must be judged a complete success for the museum. Without such a display building, I cannot see how the museum could have continued.

Carrick/CoA should have been a great success as well. But Carrick had been neglected well before the SMM came on the scene. Carrick (as I remember her) is actually an index of British attitudes to maritime preservation. Everyone wants it done but the serious money required tends not to appear or only after a great deal of painful head banging.

Carrick could have been to Irvine what Trincolmalee is in Hartlepool but somehow or other the deep political drivers that would be needed never appeared. Indeed the museum has had several dices with death in the meantime. Braehead has been an up and down saga. Dumbarton has been a consistent star. I believe the museum is much healthier now than say 10 years ago. Sam Galbraith is a chair of trustees of great ability. And can the museum be blamed that its neighbours in power chose to spend £14.8 million of Millennium money on The Big Idea? That was a project that spectacularly bombed and whose legacy is an unwanted bridge across Irvine Harbour being one of the three main obstacles to City of Adelaide's exit. Imagine the result if that money had gone to the clipper.

In the end Sunderland and Adelaide (with no real direction from Scotland beyond the sense they wanted it far away and the land back for its owner) had to compete. Adelaide has de facto won and I wish them well, although I don't imagine it will be easy. Why did Sunderland lose? Because in the end it is a political game and Sunderland's politicians were not fired up. Somehow not enough of them could see the big picture. But may I suggest this fits in with another related agenda. Sunderland has taken its museum service out of the Tyne & Wear joint service this spring. It has in its patch Washington F Pit museum which hardly ever opens. There is the Air Museum now NELSAM (easy to understand, not). Just follow the SIGNS to that operation to get an index on the matter. The lads there have a wonderful collection, a lot of ambition (thankfully a load of sheds) but they are tucked out in the Sunderland sticks and as I know from attending an open day this summer, the resource they would need to be viable will be considerable. And viability is important, if something is restored but cannot earn its keep (allowing that a trust's fund raising may balance the books) it can't work. I grew up with the Norfolk Wherry Albion which remains a success story but the Trust there has managed to keep things in balance. To have made Carrick work in Sunderland would have demanded her being part of a historic quarter redevelopment like Trincolmalee. I wonder to what extent Sunderland's leaders looked down the road at nearby Hartlepool and thought is there room for two?

The preserved railways of the North East show the same process. The Weardale is a big project with ambition, a good intellectual case, Look at in 2013! It has become a disaster. Look at the Bowes Railway in SUNDERLAND's patch. Again the intellectual case is unarguable. It is a major monument. Has it flourished in this time span? No it has struggled from crisis to crisis. So the story of transport based heritage in Sunderland in the last two decades is not a flush of successes.  


Nor should it be forgotten that for many of these last 20 years Sunderland did have an historic ship to attend to? Do not forget the Manxman and its stay at the Pallion Shipyard and how through 2011-12 it was scrapped there (https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.437312522989435.73702229.148176968569660&type=3). Does it surprise Carrick is not going to Sunderland? Disappointed yes, surprised no.

Where do I plan to be on Monday? Irvine with my wife Fiona (who I met at the SMM) - god willing. It will be a very historic moment, I hope it is not the end, I hope Carrick does reach Adelaide and that they love her in abundance! If anyone from the SMM recognises me on Monday, I shall smile and offer my handshake.

Robert Forsythe
http://about.me/forsytherobert  

My FB album https://www.facebook.com/robert.forsythe.39/media_set?set=a.532283613512065.1073741833.100001912940850&type=1

Photos also at
Also http://www.flickr.com/photos/scottishmaritimemuseum/9684998543/in/photostream/
and its neighbours. 

Twitter feed of the move of Adelaide Carrick is at https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Cityofadelaide&src=hash 

The ship finally left Irvine 20th September and reached Chatham on the 25th. Only to find it was still not plain sailing  http://robertatforsythe.blogspot.co.uk/2013/09/carrick-city-of-adelaide-leaves-irvine.html . This link is also very pertinent
http://bit.ly/1btSBy7 .

Money wasted which could have been spent on the clipper. 

Tuesday, 5 March 2013

Eilleen Burt as a Labour candidate in Prudhoe West Ward


                            (one of our challenges, the delightful but antiquated 1883 access to the A69)



Here is an open letter sent to Prudhoe Town Councillor Eilleen Burt and now County Council candidate for Labour in our ward

Dear Eilleen

Firstly may I congratulate you on announcing your candidacy for the county council Prudhoe West Ward where I live.

I try not to take sides but respect all mainstream viewpoints and debate with them.


You will probably know I help to voluntarily admin
<https://www.facebook.com/pages/Take-Pride-in-Prudhoe-2012/244877205624467>

We welcome Prudhoe's politicians engaging in debate there. All we try to do as admins is to keep it polite.

I wonder if you have found <http://robertatforsythe.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/prudhoe-election-year-vision.html> and other things I have written about Prudhoe there.

If you succeed in your campaign. I very much hope you will be able to keep Prudhoe in the limelight and to make it a 21st century town.

For my money that phrase 21st century is so important. The last year has revealed much across Northumberland about how Northumberland Estates operate. Surely not an approach the Labour party condones? Landlordism at its worst?

What will you offer the local community by way of engagement with its landowner to review the town centre development whilst it appears in hiatus to change it to something meeting broader appreciation?

I passionately think the sites needs development but it needs a 21st century project and the one on offer is from the 1980s. Who would design a new supermarket that does NOTHING to get public transport to the front door? One of many many deficiencies.

Other subjects I take an interest in include public transport and the landscape. Prudhoe has a wealth of surrounds and history. It is a glorious place to live and it can be better. A vision for green infrastructure is being drawn to the PCP's attention on the 16 April. Will you speak up for that?

Only in the last few weeks have I been shown a hidden colliery landscape of the 1870s still in existence in Prudhoe and on county land. This should be an asset. It is a remarkable survival.

People like Peter Nevin have done a lot for Prudhoe's public transport. Despite which changes in March will mean that the south and west of the town are very poorly served. How could Ferndene appear with no public transport?

Peter wants to see the interchange completed with more parking and decent waiting areas. He knows how it can be done. I support him. Will you?

I should say I am a member of the Tyne Valley Line Rail Users Group (only a fiver payable by Pay Pal), a board member of Tyne Valley Line Community Rail Partnership and on the PCP Transport Working Group.

I hope before the election Prudhoe debates its future. Will you be making arrangements to set up a public debate or hustings in The Spetchells?

I always welcome converse and debate either on line or in person. And should you knock on our door you can come prepared with answers to my questions.

Monday, 21 January 2013

Prudhoe: an election year vision



                                Prudhoe:  a personal vision
Myself and Fiona have lived in Prudhoe since 1990. We have been active in church life here and in neighbouring parishes most of the time. Fiona ran Brownies, now Guides, in Stocksfield. We are both self employed, it is no sinecure and we are not 100% healthy. I have run a personal blog robertatforsythe and from that:  engagement with a Facebook page Take Pride in Prudhoe has developed since June 2012. The moment when I started blogging about Prudhoe was specific http://robertatforsythe.blogspot.co.uk/2010/10/hanging-gardens-of-prudhoe-aka-prudhoe.html

Prudhoe’s town centre project, coupled also to my interest in transport, are the two factors that have led me to consider wider issues of public life in the town. Along the way, the blogging and participation in the Prudhoe Community Partnership Transport Working Group have introduced us to the cast involved in Prudhoe’s decision making.

Now it is January 2013, Northumberland County and Prudhoe Town Council elections will be held in May. Northumberland County has to produce a Local Development Plan and the content of that does connect to the election. I try my best not to be a political party person, despite which some people say “you will achieve nothing as a commentator or writer, you will only be heard if you have office”. Will I be persuaded by that argument in 2013?

If I had to explain my own political philosophy, I would say it derives first and foremost from my Christian faith. It could be summarised in about two clauses: enterprise and fairness. Christianity is not a socialist or communist faith. Judaism is full of wealth generation. Christ is often talking about landowners, the rich men. BUT with riches come responsibility. His vision of the landlord is that of the steward under God. In short if capitalism comes without ethics and a personal sense of responsibility it will quickly become sinful. Capitalism needs business people who enjoy creating jobs. The businesses we have must be celebrated. We might though also look at Hexham and compare and contrast what Egger puts into its community? Are we doing better or worse? We have big business in Prudhoe and we have great small businesses. We make a point of putting business to Balls, Threadgolds, the Windsor Bakery, Spend & Save.

It also follows from this notion of responsibility that people take both personal responsibility but also corporate. It is the origin of the long and evolving notion of “fair-mindedness” which certainly inspires what has been called Christian Socialism and is what underpins the growth of Britain’s liberal democracy.

My interest in Prudhoe’s civic life was considerably piqued by the Town Centre. Prudhoe does need a new town centre. There is one area of open land adjacent to the centre owned by our feudal landlord the Duke of Northumberland. This should have been a good news story. However as my blog reveals and other threads like https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.126685664071864.26003.100001912940850, this has become a farce worthy of Clochemerle. It involves a lot of sewage.

By now we should all have been rejoicing at an award winning 21st century development. Instead owing to the ineptitude of the Duke’s operation and his unwillingness to show personal leadership in the town, a project was bluttered through the planning process. It has attracted immense opposition and it promises to put something from the 1980s onto a beautiful hillside where it will be visible for miles. It will include what could easily become the most windswept and blighted multi storey car park in Britain.

Furthermore many of Prudhoe’s politicians must have assumed that come May 2013, this project would have ceased being an election issue. Far from it. For at the moment of victory in June 2012, the principle supermarket partner Sainsbury was in the process of walking away. For the neighbours of the project, intense planning blight is the result. For my money, now would be an excellent time to revisit the whole scheme.

Either the landlord should do this with enthusiasm in true partnership with the community, or the community should act to buy the land. A planning competition should then be organised to design a mixed use development around the watchwords of 21st century, green, sustainable, smart. If it is practical a supermarket will be included. The result should be of sufficient merit using its hillside location to help turn Prudhoe into a destination.

Prudhoe as a destination? That raises all sorts of question. They start with the idea that there is no signing to the town from either the A1 or the A69. This has to change! One explanation for this lack of signing is the planner’s desire to limit use of Ovingham Bridge. The county tell us it must last for 25 more years. Every politician in this town should be expected by the voters to say NO. The bridge was built in 1882 long before motor vehicles were known. The situation is completely ridiculous and is more than the bridge.

“The bridge” encompasses an out of date and decaying structure completely unfit for purpose. At the north end is a convoluted and obviously dangerous junction. Ovingham goes through hell thanks to that. South of the bridge is a level crossing which Network Rail wish to abolish or downgrade. Then there is the infamous sump which regularly floods.

The solution is not THAT difficult. Schemes have been generated before and no funding found. My favourite is to build a B road from the east end roundabout at Princess Way and take it across railway and river in a gap in the Spetchells and across fields to Horsley Interchange on the A69. About three miles and no property affected? What is SO difficult? MONEY. Prudhoe has active businesses and space for more along Princess Way. They deserve decent access to an adjacent dual carriageway instead of which they have to fight to reach Blaydon or Riding Mill. All along the A695 communities would be delighted if the “Prudhoe” traffic was given a swift access to the A69. 

Road development should not stop at this. Prudhoe has middling access east and west. It has poor access north over Ovingham Bridge and no access south to the Derwent Valley. Despite which the route south exists past Duke’s Hagg to Newlands (Ebchester). These roads which are entirely in Northumberland should also come into the B road project. All the recent development on the Prudhoe Hospital site lends weight to this.

In recent years, Prudhoe Station has been a success story with clear year on year growth. Station facilities need to be improved. The resolution in the last year of parking charge ambiguities at the Country Park is good news. Despite that the Interchange car park needs to expand onto the remaining empty plot. This could be done in various ways. It might embrace waiting facilities (even a ticket office?). 

What has not worked at Prudhoe Station has been Bus Meets Train. Car, bike and pedestrian do in serious numbers. Resolving the bus and train issue is really beyond Prudhoe’s politicians pay grade. I know valiant efforts have been made. It would need a transport planning structure like the NEXUS Quality Bus Contract to resolve the connectivity and ticketing issues. But that comes at a definite price and is unlikely to be popular in Northumberland. QBC is an ongoing issue at Nexus. It does effect Prudhoe, all the town’s bus routes would go into the scheme as would Ovingham’s. It should be a doorstep election issue. Do you want the QBC? Are you happy to pay for it?

When May arrives, further changes will have taken place to the Town’s bus network. The Service 10 consultation Go North East held was a shade symbolic in that the buses to operate the changes were ordered before the consultation! Broadly GNE do their best for Prudhoe. There will have been NEW buses in 2010 and 2013. The railway uses pre 1990 stock. Yet the truth is the changes see a clear loss of service west of the traffic lights. Northumberland could up their public transport game considerably. Connected Up Northumberland as a strap line should link the Tyne Valley Line to what is planned in South East Northumberland .Trains from Hexham through Prudhoe to Wansbeck Hospital (for instance) are easily achievable. Yes, easily. The scheme is being put through, but will we be connected to it?

The sad saga of the 686 and its bus stops and hail and ride have shown in the last few years the poor response by the County Council. Bus stops erected all along Princess Way only for the service to cease. Three bus stops in a 100 yards at the former West Wylam surgery. A request for a proper terminal for what was going to be an hourly town service including Castle Road finally became a very poorly executed and unpopular scheme whereby the level Castle Road lost its hail and ride, whilst Edgewell remains such.

If you live at Cheviot View what sort of access do you have to public transport? An innovation which the County have supported and is welcome is the presence of ADAPT in town. I always remain baffled about why such a hilly town is such a bus nightmare with large swathes of the town like Castlefield, Ferndene, Moor Road having no service at all.

How do I think this has come about? There is much disquiet that West Wylam lost their direct Newcastle bus service, the 604. But think about this, try regularly taking full size buses frequently through housing estates full of parked cars, covered in traffic calming obstacles and in winter weather generally lacking a clearance regime. The history of the exercise was such that the bus companies simply don’t want to do it. If that were to change it would have to be a county initiative and I doubt the will of the county to really wish to do it. Taxis, car sharing and ADAPT will be how most Prudhoe citizens without a car or a bike move within the town (or on their own two feet). I don’t think it is desirable but I think it is the realistic prospect. Personally I will be surprised if in five years, a bus service still comes down Castle Road. At best and it could be quite good, regular town services will re-appear but run by an ADAPT style operation with vehicles suited to the roads.

From Castle Road we can slide away into some other development issues. What was the logic in building Eltringham Court and insisting they had to use the old Hammerite access road uphill? Why was the connection not made direct into the end of Castle Road? Would anyone involved say “I insist those people have to use that horrific stretch of tarmac on a day like this”?

Hammerite itself is closing, regrettable that it is. There will be a considerable brownfield area there. What is to happen (and it could include the now demolished (bar one) rows of Eltringham Village)? Is this an attractive development site? Could it go to a supermarket and more houses? If it did and a roundabout was installed, would that be the chance to connect Eltringham Court properly to the outside world? Even more radically would the challenges of Castle Road be solved by making the spine of Castle Road one way to an outlet at this roundabout? Does that make the space outside Prudhoe Castle School safer?

Schools: such a subject and I am no expert. The new High School project is a very good thing for Prudhoe, not so good that there seems to be a delay?  If Prudhoe Castle School has an issue over road safety then Highfields/St Matthews certainly do to. And the solution is again in the hands of the county. They own all the necessary land to realign and improve the S bend outside these two schools. There is the space for improved drop off pick up areas (moving the highway slightly east). A relatively easy scheme with a clear pay off. Schools can slide discussion into arts and culture. The High School has a good reputation for this. The FUSE centre is effectively a world class resource in a small town. The town has every reason to be proud of it but in 2012 it was dogged by stories concerning funding. I am not well informed enough but that moves the debate from bricks and mortar to the virtual.

One of Prudhoe’s major challenges in my mind is communication. Find out how many of the movers and shakers blog, tweet and facebook. They are all the future but have actually become part of our past. Prudhoe as a body of citizenry needs to embrace all these opportunities. For years now I have asked where is the Second Life representation of the Town Centre plan? Where is the on line FAQ maintained in digestible language about the plan? It was one motivation in taking hold of the Take Pride in Prudhoe page. But this should not be private individuals. This should be the work of the Prudhoe Community Partnership, whose funding during the year that the flagship Spetchells Centre opened, fell. They lost business and publicity development skills and resource that they had.  Councillors should (yes should) actively engage with their electorate through new media. There are two good examples of people showing the way: Neil Bradbury and our MP Guy Opperman.

Schooling also puts Eastwoods School into view and then that reminds us how West Wylam as a whole has lost its bus service to Newcastle, its post office, its school, its community centre. There are good news stories there though. Do not laugh, the waste management facility is exemplary. There may during the life of this blog entry be really good news about the old surgery. Manors is a good news story and there is an active resident’s association.

That introduces a wider point about Prudhoe. The bottle half full or half empty. Prudhoe Castle exemplifies this. The oldest structure in town, in great condition, managed from York and not contributing much to civic life. Prudhoe does have many excellent and exciting aspects to it. The community street party and the torch relay and the Rememberance Day parade, those all show the best of Prudhoe in 2012. There is great community spirit but there is also frustration about being done unto , whether by the landlord, a railway company run from York,  or a rather remote local administration in Morpeth and pre-occupied by South East Northumberland (which is the other side of one or two more large authorities).

The community spirit is being shown in a campaign involving Dragon Tale (http://www.dragontaletheatregroup.co.uk/about-us/4566159981) for an arts centre which I wish well. It can be seen every day in Waterworld which is a great resource. It can be seen in the Friends of Prudhoe Woods and Prudhoe Pathforce. I hope that the latter secure the path beyond Mickley Level Crossing beside the river Tyne. How many of you know Marion Lewis? Actually an Ovingham resident. She quietly clears rubbish around Prudhoe on a regular basis. So do numerous other activists revolving around James Dobson. Our riverbanks and our wonderful country part benefit from their attentions.

The Woods are one of the great resources of Prudhoe. They have been closely studied (Hyons Wood). The Woodland Trust is here as is The Friends of Prudhoe Woods. Are we as a community going to make sure Hyons Wood does not become an opencast? See Whittonstall Action Group http://www.whittonstallactiongroup.co.uk/home.php . In the woods are fantastic reminders of our past like 250 year old waggonways with stone structures and embankments. Have you seen them?

The woods shade into gardens and then you think of the Prudhoe Gardener’s Association and all the allotments around the town. Their presence is one reason why the town centre debate is energised: building on allotments by the owners of the Alnwick Gardens. It does not totally add up.

Good quality leisure, a good place to be is certainly part of a vision for Prudhoe. For my money it is a vital one. We still live surrounded by a green lung here. Our children can still make the link between animals, plants and food. When it snows, there are many places to play and sledge. For exercise there is an excellent swimming pool and innumerable walks from the front door. As Prudhoe changes and develops through another election cycle ask your potential politicians, what is their vision for retaining all the best we have whilst tackling the frustrations that are also present?

Tuesday, 25 December 2012

A Christmas Day Review

A Christmas day review: The Queen saying in five minutes all you need to know about Christmas. Her Christianity is no threat to another's religion save in the revelation that Christ's God is not about power but service. The Archbishop of Canterbury had suitable humility, expressed over the women's bishops vote. The Pope praying in detail on a global scale for Peace. Amen to that. The Archbishop of Westminster OUCH. Let's hit below the belt when our paunches are full of stuffing. When will those Catholics who Amen him (not all do) GET IT? We're beyond Gay bashing or we should be. And where are my particular Christmas prayers? For a family tragically killed on the M6 earlier today and for all emergency and service workers who have to work today but especially for the many railwaymen struggling over the holiday to get it all back to work. We remember you.

Sunday, 16 December 2012

Chrildren killed in Newtown

The beginning and end of a Facebook discussion. My comments

https://www.facebook.com/robert.forsythe.39/posts/417553461651748

If you wish to be known as a civilised nation YOU WILL maintain strict gun control laws. That is my British view.
to
 As has been noted mine is a British perspective. Somewhere above is the statement " to protect the citizenry from an oppressive government.". It would appear that to protect American citizens from the danger of Messrs Reagan, Bush, and Obama it is worth the death of a lot of littles ones. Are those names so much worse than Thatcher, Blair and Cameron. I might disagree with all three but I would rather have the British version of gun control (with the tragedies we have had as well) than the American version. That is my heart felt take and I will prophesy two things 1) most folk in Britain will agree and 2) at the present rate there will come a point where our American cousins "get it". You cannot lead the free world and allow this to continue. It does not wash.
and a new tack on the theme

For freedom to work, willing sacrifices have to be made. On this planet true freedom cannot be a free for all. However such sacrifices should never include innocent children!

 

Monday, 19 November 2012

Principles for developing a new town centre in Prudhoe

About two years ago I first launched off into the subject of Prudhoe Town Centre floating the concept of The Hanging Gardens of Prudhoe. Perhaps that was open to mis-interpretation? A great deal has happened since then and a great deal had already happened by October 2010. Yet in November 2012 and despite the award of planning permission on June 20th 2012 to the Duke of Northumberland for a new town centre there is little imminent sense of anything about to happen, Two factors in the present hiatus are perhaps at work. One might be Spencer Court at Newburn. The other is not a might be but a certainty. All along through the present scheme, the people of Prudhoe believed Sainsbury was on board as the operator of the planned supermarket. But during late October 2012 (earlier in some people's minds) Sainsbury made it very clear from CEO level that they were having nothing to do with the Prudhoe scheme and had no present ambition to open a supermarket here.

What happens next? Potentially nothing which for those properties neighbouring and thereby blighted is a dismal thought. The Duke has his planning permission (or does he because "Section 106" is not yet signed off?). He can sell it on, he can find another supermarket (would any other chain going into the detail of this complex and controversial project make a different call to Sainsbury?). He could seek to vary the consent and perhaps just build houses. Or he could say the way this has gone on these last few years has not produced any winners, how else could things be made to work?

What follows is blue sky thinking on the assumption that either the landowner wishes to work with the community to deliver aspirations welcomed by both groups or the landowner has been persuaded to sell the land to a body like the Prudhoe Community Partnership and there is then the promise of a community led redevelopment.

What sort of principles in designing a new town centre in 2012 could be adopted?

Suggested watchwords: 21st century, respect for one's neighbours, work with not against the hillside, a new supermarket is desirable, provision for artizan/small town scale operations which draw the folk to the community, the new Legion building, something cutting edge for creatives/self employed/internet cafe/studio style business, build on the solid gardening traditions of the site, the Alnwick Garden and the Prudhoe Gardeners Association,  ensuring that the non-car owning public have ready access to the core of any new development (that is not so with what is on offer see here), ensuring a brand name or strap line exists from early in the project to give it life and suggest it is a destination, using the tools of 21st century social media to develop the concept and to maintain a FAQ during its implementation (e.g. Second Life visuals).

Who would lead? If the Prudhoe Community Partnerhip took a lead, they would need to retain "honest broker/mentor skills" from development experts. A range of such agencies local and national exist. In no particular order I suggest some:

http://www.theglasshouse.org.uk/ Glasshouse

http://www.livingneighborhoods.org/ht-0/bln-exp.htm Building Living Neighbourhoods

http://www.northernarchitecture.com/home.html Northern Archictecture

http://www.xsitearchitecture.co.uk/ Xsite architecture and Tim Bailey

http://bardonmill-villagehall.co.uk/ Bardon Mill's 21st century partially underground village hall

http://www.designbykiosk.co.uk/about.aspx Christoph Oschatz and Design by Kiosk in Bensham

https://www.facebook.com/ArchDaily ArchDaily

Thursday, 19 July 2012

East Coast Consultation Newcastle Today

I had to miss the East Coast Consultation today. Fortunately Dennis Peel from Tyne Valley Line Rail Users group could be there. I put in his summary highlights, his words:
" The change which may affect us is the suggestion that "feeder" services including N/C to Carlisle might be brought into the East Coast franchise. I asked and it was confirmed that if this were to occur it would be all lines in the North East, not picking and choosing.  If this were to happen it would have a big effect on the present Northern Franchise and the date might be later than Dec 2013. Much interest from the users groups present on this topic.

The East Coast Franchise would run for 15 years and with slippage etc would be renewed around 2032 to coincide with HS2 coming to N/C. (As I see it (which I probably wont') HS2 does not cut N/C to London time, but brings in N/C to Leeds, Manchester, Birmingham and Heath Row) There would still need to be an East Cost route. "

This is a fascinating report. It confirms what in recent weeks we have been able to deduce. There is probably a rail industry turf war going on really driven by Heaton depot! The one depot which services all North East local trains is also a jewel in the crown for East Coast and for Northern's servicing schedules with it specialising in Pacers. If I managed East Coast I would want it and I would take the local services too. But we who live in the North East need our priorities to be heard. It is clear we have not done this very well for the last 5-10 years. If we had, the drive on the Lancashire Yorkshire Corridor or in South Wales would have comparable results here. Are politicians in the North East and Nexus going to belatedly wake up to what is going on? Our own MP Guy Opperman excepted or will we become bit actors in another's franchise for 15 years?

Wednesday, 18 July 2012

After the curry and with the MP, a write up (see preceding entry)


The Valley 16th July 2012
A dissemination of the discussion about Tyne Valley and North East Rail Services.
Notes by Robert Forsythe www.fionnconsultancy.co.uk
Immediate Concerns
On the whole there are significant levels of satisfaction at present over reliability and pleasure at investment, like the Ticket Machine at Prudhoe, and the three interchanges that have opened.

There are important immediate concerns and they largely focus on capacity at peak hours and on special events. The gap of over an hour inbound from Hexham during the morning peak was discussed and I believe Northern understand this could be solved.  The user side understands Northern is and has progressed the last train issue (the new Prudhoe stopper). As ever the inability to collect revenue when the train is full concerns. This impacts on the Newcastle barrier situation.

The new football season starting late summer, and the Northumberland Show next year, are opportunities for Northern to show they can rectify problems which have been mentioned over many years. The timetable is not the challenge at these events if it is operated correctly, it is the capacity. I concluded Northern were determined to review this. In particular Gaynor Shotton from the County Show was invited to form a strong working relationship with the Northern management team and the Community Rail Partnership/Rail users group.

The need is : sufficient carriages for the NorthumberlandShow and the marketing of travelling by train. If the Show and the Railway could offer an advance purchase discount ticket, the railway can manage demand and those who turn up on the day with no ticket have to accept what can be offered. Robert Forsythe can show Gaynor sales literature for parallel events.

I think Northern were happy that on the performance of peak hours train like the strengthened 0742, and the 2013 Show and the football day services, attitudes towards the company in the Tyne Valley could be influenced.

The cost of tickets from stations west of Hexham are perceived as being disproportionately high. Northern offered to look closely at the pricing models from stations such as Bardon Mill and Haltwhistle. There are also issues around commuters who may only use the line 3 or 4 days a week have no incentive to purchase a season ticket (too expensive for their needs), and no multi- journey discount exists. A carnet ticket like the Harrogate line is needed.

There are several large employers in Newcastle (eg Northumbria University) whose staff travel on Northern. Whereas Nexus offers a direct sale of season tickets (at a discount) to large organisations who then sell them to their staff (managed directly through payroll), it was not felt that Northern offered a similar package.



Medium Term Concerns
Northern Rail will certainly operate the services for at least another two years. They have a new management team and the Valley side made the point that a much stronger management presence for the North East based around Newcastle is most desirable. My reading suggests the Northern team appreciated this? There could be changes within the franchise period?

There is an inherent challenge in a stand still franchise (the present one) experiencing clear and considerable growth. In the medium term the Northern team indicated there are further initiatives they could contemplate progress with (does not equal full implementation within the period). Specifically: much improved services for Dunston and Blaydon could be examined (this was from the Northern side). Gilsland is a candidate for re-opening with its World Heritage Site and Long Distance Path hub capability. Guy Opperman is ready to liaise with several parish councils and Rory Stewart MP over this, also Hadrian’s Wall Heritage. Commissioned studies have already indicated its viability.

The role of the Class 142 four wheel Leyland bus based Pacers will always be discussed at a meeting like this. They are not popular with passengers especially when crowded or on the curves at Newcastle. The Northern side did throw open the possibility that for cost effectiveness, they might be rebodied. Robert Forsythe suspects the Rail User side will wish to see this discouraged mightily in the future, from now forwards.

Longer Term
From 2014, there will be a new local train franchise for our area. This was actively discussed by all the parties.  Before this discussion however, everyone noted the 16th July 2012 Government  news about further  rail funding. Universal agreement that this is good for the country and for the rail industry. It for instance removes all Pacers from the South Wales Valleys making the Tyne Valley and other North East lines good candidates to use them last of all. There was also round table agreement that the investment news offers very little to the North East in terms of schemes. The Northern Hub concept  has spin off benefits, it might bring electric wires to Middlesbrough. But the North East has been marginal through the Northern Hub process and the further investment does not change this. All round the table agreed that the North East had not been good through the franchise period in progressing the several rail investment schemes possible in its area.

As a result, three probabilities post 2014 exist. Northern continue as our operator or another company on exactly the same patch. The Valley side articulated the view that could only work if there was a strong Newcastle management and a programme in the franchise for the North East. The present Northern franchise had started with a North East management team and it had been diluted.

The second option which current East Coast consultation allows for is that the new East Coast franchise takes Heaton depot including its local train work in North East England. Heaton is a jewel in the crown depot (Nick Brown MP), it is important to both local and mainline train operators out of Newcastle and it has a specialist maintenance record. The user side can see that within the industry there will be well hidden moves about the future of Heaton!

The third option is that the North East community organise themselves in advance of the DfT consultation and argue for a Northumbria  franchise for all the Heaton local train work. This is around 20 trains and even with expansion the probability is that no more than 35 trains are needed. It is not a large business but it is a natural geographic and business entity. It seemed that the Northern team could understand this thinking and that within their own business the powerhouse that is Lancashire and Yorkshire sets agendas?

There was considerable discussion about how successful first Manchester and then its neighbours had been in securing investment and in now adopting the Decentralisation philosophy. There was discussion about what the North East would need to follow this example. There are agencies who might lead: Nexus, North East Chamber of Commerce, Association of North East Local Authorities. So far no-one with authority had taken the lead role in a regional discussion. Guy Opperman is probably the most senior North Eastern politician leading a debate on it. It has to go further if it is to work with a local entity and soon.

The industry side suggested the community side needs to generate a “compact”, possibly through the vehicle of an LEP. A specific follow up to this Valley meeting could be a high level regional day conference on the future of local rail in the North East. Would the North East Chamber of Commerce lead? How would transport providers and politicians current react to that? This has to be scheduled before the DfT issue the consultation over the franchise and that is scheduled for later in 2012. MPs like David Milliband or Nick Brown who have so far not become involved may need to be.

THE ABOVE PARAGRAPH IS CRUCIAL

This discussion the lead into the blue sky of what the North East asks for in its next franchise. There is quite a long shopping list. Peterlee Station and Tees Valley Metro (James Cook station) are at implementation or very near so). Leamside (Washington) and Ashington re-openings have all been talked about and studied in detail for years. SENRUG has a massive and explored vision over what could come from the Ashington project. The Northern side threw open the blue sky idea that Trans Pennine Express could terminate at Ashington.

On the Tyne Valley, Gilsland and Blaydon have already been spoken off by the rail users as priority. A Northern team member said think bigger. Ask to be electrified as part of the fleet renewal. Remember the importance to East Coast of the line as a diversion. Then you think the future has to be an electric Tyne Valley and Coast and Saltburn Bishop lines to get a thoroughly 21st century local rail network. All local trains would then be electric apart from Whitby. This opens the idea that part of what holds the Tyne Valley back is infrastructure. The present diesel trains have a speed in excess of most of the line speed. Improve the line speed limit and even with the present trains schedules could improve.

The evening ended then with three challenges: to Northern to deliver much closer and stronger local management connected to North East communities, to the User side to go out and get the North East community itself better connected to lobby for its own connectivity, the third challenge being to combine these two forces to create the next local train franchise on an expansive and not stand still basis.


Present
Guy Opperman MP (the inviter)
From Northern Rail
Alan Chaplin Chief Operating Officer
Richard Allan Area Director for Yorkshire and Humberside, Tyne Tees and Wear.
Both above from 30th May 2012  http://www.northernrail.org/news/7044
Drew Halley Client and Stakeholder Manager Northern Rail
From Tyne Valley Rail Users Group/Community Partnership
Robert Forsythe  Prudhoe
Fiona Forsythe Prudhoe
John Gillott Heddon TVCRP partnership officer
Julie Gibbon Bardon Mill
Minnie Fraser Mickley
Alastair Fraser Mickley
Tony Geary Wylam
Tina Geary Wylam
From Northumberland Show (moving Corbridge>Bywell (Stocksfield Station)
Gaynor Shotton
From North East Chamber of Commerce
Mark Scandle
Facebook References Please ensure that you like these pages
Northumbria Rail Franchise Lobby Group
Tyne Valley Line Rail Users Group
Tyne Valley Line Community Rail Partnership