An open letter sent directly to my county councillor
Dear Eileen
You are my county councillor. About 70 days hence is the
election. I googled “Councillor Eileen Burt” and this is the result. https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%22Councillor+Eileen+Burt&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&gws_rd=cr&ei=oerqVPuCIpf3aoP_gbAJ#q=%22Councillor+Eileen+Burt%22
. Going forward the Labour party has the opportunity to persuade folk to vote.
I am interested in knowing your vision of what Prudhoe might expect to gain
from a Labour party win and if this was repeated, what policies there are say
over a 12 year period to change the town. Specifically will the Labour party be
supporting the creation of a Neighbourhood Plan as other communities in
Tynedale now have? What is the Labour party policy towards the electrification
of the Tyne Valley Railway line and will this be the means to remove the Pacer
trains? As a local councillor what further improvements are visualised at
our railway station and with our road network? I believe the expansion of
Prudhoe calls for a new B road from Ebchester in the Derwent Valley to the
Horsley interchange on the A69 with a new bridge crossing of the Tyne starting
from the east end of Princess Way. This will not happen quickly but unless it
features in policy it will never happen. The railway station this year missed
out on better waiting shelter replacements (instead like for like). Just as the
Northern refranchise cannot be another stand still franchise, it would have
been far more effective if the Labour party had campaigned for the real
improvements needed locally. In the event it was left to people like Peter
Nevin and myself and Network Rail have run rings around us. The lack of a Town
Council Transport Working Group shows this up (and quite humanly there are real
limits to what I can do voluntarily). Many more issues are down there,
the expansion of car parking (although I believe this is in hand from the
county?). The better shelters for an expanding town are a necessity, so is a
new footbridge. Proper integration with bus services and fares is another.
I would welcome both a new town centre and the redevelopment
of Prudhoe hospital. But in each instance I want to know how electing a Labour
government will ensure these become “excellent” projects, not will do. By this
I mean for instance the thought that is given into community structures and employment
opportunities at the hospital site and how some of the buildings there can be
reused. To simply flatten and build nigh on 500 homes with no new transport
infrastructure and employment provision to me stacks up problems. At the Town
Centre I have long argued that the site demands the best solution, a Hanging
Gardens of Prudhoe development with car parking hidden in the hillside. A
result that meant the site’s many neighbours were wowed and not antagonised.
Much of this is about planning. I am aware of many pressures in regard to the
Green Belt. Prudhoe is within the Land of Oak and Iron heritage landscape
project. The reason people will want to live in Prudhoe in part is because of
its high quality landscape surround. How will electing a Labour government
ensure that Prudhoe’s woodlands remain a gem? And how will Prudhoe benefit from
the Land of Oak and Iron?
Over a whole range of issues, to my experience including
transport spend, arts spend, heritage lottery spend the comparison per head
between the North East Region and London is grossly disproportionate. If the
Labour party form the next government I want to form an idea as to how a change
in that policy will change Prudhoe for the better.
For my interests, these are the sorts of matters that I
think need debate and I will be very keen that you locally as a leading Labour
politician set out the stall. In that spirit I regard this as an open letter
and any reply should be in a similar vein.
Yours Sincerely
Robert Forsythe
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am grateful for a reply to this letter received from Liam Carr, prospective Parliamentary Candidate of the Labour party in the Hexham Constituency.
I am grateful for a reply to this letter received from Liam Carr, prospective Parliamentary Candidate of the Labour party in the Hexham Constituency.
Dear
Robert,
Your
raises a few issues, I will address each theme.
Rail
Services.
Privatisation
was a disaster for the railways. The whole franchising system has been a
failure and passengers are paying more for a worse service, the Pacer trains
are going but they will be replaced by cast off underground trains from London
that may not be suited the Northumberland weather.
The
next Labour government will allow the public sector to compete with private
companies for rail franchises when they expire, this will result in public
sector running sections of our rail network as soon as possible, in the same
sort of way as East Coast did.
We
aren't saying we want to go back to some sort of 1980s British Rail, but we
have to acknowledge that privatisation was a mistake and its one that we must
rectify.
The
next Labour Government will be different from the one elected in 1997, it is OK
to say that some things like Health, Education and Transport, are too important
to be left to market forces.
With
profits coming back to the treasury, this will allow investment in the Tyne
Valley line.
Roads
and other infrastructure.
Labour
will devolve power away from Whitehall, so instead of having to beg for real
investment in the and ending up with a feasibility study, decisions will be
made closer to home.
Labour
has a strong track record of devolving power. We passed the Scotland Act
and the Government of Wales Act and we are now committed to an English
Devolution Act, which will reverse the centralisation which has occurred under
successive governments in the recent (and not so recent) past.
We
will transfer £30 billion of funding over five years, passing on power and
resource not only for transport, which you mention, but also skills, employment
support, housing and business support.
What
difference will a Labour Government make in Prudhoe?
I
have listened to many residents in Prudhoe who have been hit by the bedroom
tax, this is an unfair tax particularly so in Prudhoe, where there are very few
one bedroom properties to move into. Labour will repeal the bedroom tax.
We
will also reverse the privatisation of our NHS by repealing the Heath and
Social care act, the effects of which are being felt locally services at Hexham
hospital are under threat. I want to be your next MP so I can defend our NHS.
There
is still some concern about Education in our High school, Much of the
discussion we hear is about structures; politicians on all sides have been
guilty of arguing about if schools should be free schools, high schools,
supported by the LEA or be an academy. However, when listening to concerns from
parents, I hear that they are less concerned about structures - most
simply want a great local school, staffed by committed, well-qualified
teachers, which provides good outcomes for all young people. If elected I will refocus
the debate away from structures and back on what matters most; the students.
In
this election we have a choice to make, about the kind of society we want to
live in. I believe in a fair society with a recovery that benefits the
working people and not just the very wealthy and an economy that works for all
and not just a few at the top.
I
hope this reply is helpful, if you have any other policy queries please do not
hesitate to get in touch.
Liam
Carr
Liam (like Guy Opperman) has a blog which is at http://liamrcarr.blogspot.co.uk/